Difference between revisions of "C diff"

From Seth's Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Tags: Mobile web edit Mobile edit
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
=DIAGNOSIS=
 
=DIAGNOSIS=
* Laboratory testing cannot distinguish between asymptomatic colonization and active infection.
+
* Laboratory testing cannot always distinguish between asymptomatic colonization and active infection.
 
==Diagnostic criteria==
 
==Diagnostic criteria==
 
* Diarrhea
 
* Diarrhea
 
* Positive stool test for toxigenic C. diff or toxins or visualization of pseudomembranous colitis
 
* Positive stool test for toxigenic C. diff or toxins or visualization of pseudomembranous colitis
 
==Diagnostic approaches==
 
==Diagnostic approaches==
* Toxigenic Culture (TC) and/or Cell Cytotoxicity Assay (CCA)
+
* Gold Standard: Toxigenic Culture (TC) and/or Cell Cytotoxicity Assay (CCA)
 
** Anaerobic culture for 24-48 hrs followed by colony selection and culture with human cells to test for cell cytotoxicity which takes an additional 24-48 hours.
 
** Anaerobic culture for 24-48 hrs followed by colony selection and culture with human cells to test for cell cytotoxicity which takes an additional 24-48 hours.
* Gold standard
 
 
** Time consuming and difficult, up to 5 days
 
** Time consuming and difficult, up to 5 days
 
** Detects a little as 3 picograms of toxin
 
** Detects a little as 3 picograms of toxin
Line 21: Line 20:
 
* PCR / NAAT
 
* PCR / NAAT
 
** Detects tcdA/tcdB genes, mRNA for the toxins
 
** Detects tcdA/tcdB genes, mRNA for the toxins
*** Detects presence of toxigenic strains of C. diff
+
** Detects presence of toxigenic strains of C. diff
* mRNA doesn't necessarily imply active infection
+
** mRNA doesn't necessarily imply active infection
** EIA / ELISA
+
* EIA / ELISA
*** Detects toxin in stool
+
** Detects toxin in stool
*** Low sensitivity (0.73-0.87)
+
** Low sensitivity (0.73-0.87)
 
* Multistep algorithms, there are dozens
 
* Multistep algorithms, there are dozens
 
** EIA for GDH / Toxin A/B
 
** EIA for GDH / Toxin A/B
* Both positive = C. diff
+
*** Both positive = C. diff
* Both negative = NO C. diff
+
*** Both negative = NO C. diff
* Mixed results, use PCR for tcdB as tiebreaker
+
*** Mixed results, use PCR for tcdB as tiebreaker
 
** Toxin EIA 1 (Meridian), higher PPV, lower NPV
 
** Toxin EIA 1 (Meridian), higher PPV, lower NPV
 
** Toxin EIA 2 (TechLab), lower PPV, higher NPV
 
** Toxin EIA 2 (TechLab), lower PPV, higher NPV
* Highest NPV (99.8%) GDH EIA + NAAT
+
** Highest NPV (99.8%) GDH EIA + NAAT
* Highest PPV (93.5%) Toxin EIA 1 + NAAT
+
** Highest PPV (93.5%) Toxin EIA 1 + NAAT
  
 
=TREATMENT=
 
=TREATMENT=

Revision as of 16:51, 21 October 2022

Diagnosis and Treatment of C.difficil per Natasha Bagdasarian et al. Published in JAMA 2019.

Systematic review of 116 included studies between 1978 and 2014.

DIAGNOSIS

  • Laboratory testing cannot always distinguish between asymptomatic colonization and active infection.

Diagnostic criteria

  • Diarrhea
  • Positive stool test for toxigenic C. diff or toxins or visualization of pseudomembranous colitis

Diagnostic approaches

  • Gold Standard: Toxigenic Culture (TC) and/or Cell Cytotoxicity Assay (CCA)
    • Anaerobic culture for 24-48 hrs followed by colony selection and culture with human cells to test for cell cytotoxicity which takes an additional 24-48 hours.
    • Time consuming and difficult, up to 5 days
    • Detects a little as 3 picograms of toxin
  • Stool antigen looks for Glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) via ELISA (EIA)
    • Does not distinguish between toxigenic and non-toxigenic strains
    • Half of C. diff isolates are non-toxigenic
  • PCR / NAAT
    • Detects tcdA/tcdB genes, mRNA for the toxins
    • Detects presence of toxigenic strains of C. diff
    • mRNA doesn't necessarily imply active infection
  • EIA / ELISA
    • Detects toxin in stool
    • Low sensitivity (0.73-0.87)
  • Multistep algorithms, there are dozens
    • EIA for GDH / Toxin A/B
      • Both positive = C. diff
      • Both negative = NO C. diff
      • Mixed results, use PCR for tcdB as tiebreaker
    • Toxin EIA 1 (Meridian), higher PPV, lower NPV
    • Toxin EIA 2 (TechLab), lower PPV, higher NPV
    • Highest NPV (99.8%) GDH EIA + NAAT
    • Highest PPV (93.5%) Toxin EIA 1 + NAAT

TREATMENT

First line treatment

  • PO Vancomycin (78.5% success rate, 25,3% recurrence rate)
  • PO Metronidazole (66,3% success rate, 47% recurrence rate), recent strains have higher MIC

Disease stratification

  • WBC (15), Cr (1.5% baseline), recurrence, hypotension, ileus, megacolon
  • Mild = Metronidazole, preferred for cost and non-inferiority in mild disease
  • Severe/Complicated = Vancomycin
  • Recurrent = Metro or Vanco for first recurrence, Vanco for subsequent

Newer treatments

  • Fidazomicin (87.7% success rate vs. 86.8% for vanco, 15.4% recurrence rate)
    • Expensive
  • Fecal microbiota transplant (83-94% success rate for recurrent COL).
    • Fecal microbiota transplantation restores gut microbiota diversity, with the instillation of donor stool into the gastrointestinal tract of an infected patient.
    • This procedure has had good clinical response without reports of adverse events, for refractory or recurrent CDI.
    • The first systematic review was published in 2011 and included 317 patients with recurrent CDI treated with fecal microbiota transplantation via enema, nasojejunal-tube/gastroscope or colonoscopy.
    • Clinical resolution occurred in 92% of patients (89% after a single treatment), without serious adverse effects.
    • A recent review of 536 patients reported a 27% clinical response rate.
    • A randomized trial of fecal microbiota transplantation demonstrated symptom

resolution in 94% of patients who received vancomycin for s days followed by either one or two treatments with fecal microbiota transplantation, versus 31% in those receiving vancomycin alone for 14 days, and 23% for those receiving vanconycin for 14 days plus bowel lavage. This study was stopped early after interim analyses demonstrated superiority of fecal microbiota transplantation, Among 18 patients in the other treatment groups who received subsequent fecal microbiota transplantation 83% had symptom resolution