1,022
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 3:
Line 3: − +
Choice of anesthetic for cancer resection (view source)
Revision as of 22:37, 25 July 2024
, 25 July→2022 J Clin Med Review
==[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33105278/ 2021 Anesth Analg Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis]==
==[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33105278/ 2021 Anesth Analg Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis]==
Nineteen retrospective observational studies were included. Patients who received propofol-based TIVA during cancer surgery were associated with significantly better overall survival than those who received volatile anesthesia (HR = 0.79, 95% CI, 0.66-0.94, P = .008, I2 = 82%). In contrast, no statistically significant difference was observed in recurrence-free survival between patients who received propofol-based TIVA and volatile anesthesia during cancer surgery (HR = 0.81, 95% CI, 0.61-1.07, P = .137, I2 = 85%). In contrast [to desflurane], there was no statistically significant difference in overall survival between patients who received propofol-based TIVA and those who received sevoflurane (HR = 0.92, 95% CI, 0.74-1.14, P = .439, I2 = 70%).
Nineteen retrospective observational studies were included. Patients who received propofol-based TIVA during cancer surgery were associated with significantly better overall survival than those who received volatile anesthesia (HR = 0.79, 95% CI, 0.66-0.94, P = .008, I2 = 82%). In contrast, no statistically significant difference was observed in recurrence-free survival between patients who received propofol-based TIVA and volatile anesthesia during cancer surgery (HR = 0.81, 95% CI, 0.61-1.07, P = .137, I2 = 85%). In contrast [to desflurane], there was no statistically significant difference in overall survival between patients who received propofol-based TIVA and those who received sevoflurane (HR = 0.92, 95% CI, 0.74-1.14, P = .439, I2 = 70%).
==[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36431218/ 2022 J Clin ''Med Review'']==
==[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36431218/ 2022 J Clin Med ''Review'']==
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35637441/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35637441/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39039548/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39039548/